given that the account has only had 1 transaction ever witch is your funds going into the account it would be impossible to determin who owns the account .

http://burstcoin.cc:3333/
https://faucet.burstpay.net/

@energy hes swapping motion 1 and motion 2 asset shares for GPU shares and doing away with both motion assets

vote yes to replace the 970 with a 1070 or better card. what componet's are in the two rig's CPU , ram ?? it might be possible to Ebay the 970 and use the funds gained to upgrade one of the Mobo's to one with more PCI slots and still keep your current CPU ram, however you will need to calculate power draw as more than two GPU's and you might need a second powersupply and depending on space inside the case will need to rack mount everything with PCI risers ( use powered risers ) mobo's have difficulty putting full 75 wat to every PCI slot at the same time when you start connecting lots of GPU's. if on a budget its also possible to mine on lower hash power sipper GPU's the some of the 1050's are simmilar to my RX 460 as in its low hash rate but it does not use dedicated power they are sub 75 wat cards that get all power throu the PCI connection directly from the MoBo. yes they produce small hash but given the super energy efficency combined with low up front cost can make them a better option than say a 1050ti or a 1060 just from the savings in electricity.

when someone makes a post claiming low electricity usage but is still GPU / CPU mined. on a forum dedicated to a coin who's primary differance is an alternative method of mining for true effeciant energy usage........

@cryptofund yes origonaly burst fee's for a transaction was minumum 1 burst and it shows in the transactions ... that was changed at the beggening of the year to allow fee's below 1 burst and also allow multiple Batch type transaction using just 1 fee ... i know i wish it would show up as a standard transaction in my wallet as well but i do like the fact that a pool operator or an asset operator can payout to multiple people at once without having to account for the 1 burst per person transaction fees anymore. i know from exp that it was becoming an issue for some asset operators that wanted to keep a weekly div payout but in some instances smaller investors was being payout less than 1 burst wile at the same time operators has to pay 1 burst to send that fraction of a burst.

TxID 18057291082176538699 Addy BURST-R992-RURV-MCW5-8R676

@kingcajun @ZapbuzZ if you open Qbundel let it run and minimise it then instead of useing the Qbundle built in GUI use http://localhost:8125/index.html in your web browser to log in everything works just fine ......... the core wallet in Qbundel works just fine its the GUI thats all messed up

@kingcajun what he is ask in general is a vote to reinvest a portion of the profits to grow the asset or to just payout the full amount as divs and not exspand ......... eg 5% would mean divs will be 5% less and that 5% would go to invest in additional MN's to grow the asset

depending on what you can find and at what price .. anything 1070 and above is good .. in a perfect world you just build out a farm of Titan's and hash away ... but well you have to consider upfront cost as well lol